By 
Pumulo Situmbeko, leader of the New Era Democratic Party, has proposed extending immunity protections to first ladies to safeguard their dignity and shield them from potential misuse of law enforcement in corruption cases, as reportedly seen in the recent investigation of former First Lady Esther Lungu.
Speaking to Zambia Monitor from California, Situmbeko stated that prosecuting a former first lady has significant implications, cautioning that if mishandled, it could intensify political tensions and polarize the public.
The position of first lady, she stated, had historically symbolized unity and national respect.
“It is time we consider extending immunity protections to first ladies, aligning their legal standing with that of their husbands to prevent unequal treatment and uphold their dignity,” Situmbeko said.
She underscored the importance of transparency and fairness in all proceedings, stressing that justice should be impartial and unassailable.
Situmbeko urged the Drug Enforcement Commission (DEC) and other authorities to prioritise significant cases with substantial financial impact, focusing on those truly responsible for depleting Zambia’s resources.
“We must protect the integrity of our institutions and build a society where justice is fair, consistent, and geared toward the greater good,” she said.
Situmbeko also encouraged Zambians to reflect on balancing justice with respect for the dignity of public officials and their families.
She stated that the New Era Democratic Party stands firmly for the rule of law, believing accountability should extend to all citizens, regardless of their status.
Read More: Heavy police presence as former First Lady, Esther Lungu, faces money laundering charges
“However, Mrs. Lungu’s charges over a sum of 4.8 million kwacha—a figure modest compared to larger cases of financial misconduct—prompt us to question whether the DEC’s focus aligns with the broader public interest,” Situmbeko remarked.
She cited recent Financial Intelligence Centre (FIC) reports that highlighted far more significant financial abuses, including US$3 billion in suspicious transactions in a single month, and undervalued public asset deals that exposed billions in discrepancies.
“The question must be asked: why focus on a former first lady over a relatively modest amount when larger financial discrepancies demand scrutiny?” Situmbeko wondered.
She pointed out that while former presidents were protected by immunity, their spouses remain exposed to legal action, making them vulnerable to harassment and political maneuvering.
WARNING! All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express permission from ZAMBIA MONITOR.
Comments