By 
Zambia’s Constitutional Court has dismissed former President Edgar Lungu’s application for the recusal of three judges, condemning it as an attempt to control the judicial process.
The court ruled that Lungu’s application lacked substantial evidence, calling it a “brazen attempt” to undermine judicial independence.
Justice Professor Margaret Munalula, in delivering the ruling, questioned Lungu’s motives, pointing out the suspicious timing of his concerns about bias, which were raised at the “11th hour” despite previous cases being handled by the same judges without issue.
Justice Munalula reaffirmed the impartiality of the judiciary, stating, “Judges do not choose cases, and litigants do not choose judges.”
The court found Lungu’s allegations of bias against Judges Munalula, Arnold Shilimi, and Maria Kawimbe to be without merit.
Justice Shilimi noted that Lungu’s accusations bordered on contempt of court, posing a threat to the integrity of the judiciary.
Justice Kawimbe also denied any familial connection with President Hakainde Hichilema, describing Lungu’s allegations as malicious and false.
She warned that disinformation can easily spread, undermining public trust in the judicial system.
Lungu was denied leave to appeal the decision, and costs were awarded against him in favor of the petitioner and third respondent.
WARNING! All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express permission from ZAMBIA MONITOR.
Comments